a-lane-a:

shroomssavedmymind:


randomness-is-epic:
Sophia Bush has declared war on Urban Outfitters after they marketted a t-shirt with the words ‘Eat Less’ on the front.The One Tree Hill actress, in an entry on her personal blog, called for them to issue an apology and make a donation to a charity for eating disorders, and said, “It’s like handing a suicidal person a loaded gun. You should know better.”Sophia wrote, “To promote starvation? To promote anorexia, which leads to heart disease, bone density loss, and a slew of other health problems, not least of all psychological issues that NEVER go away? Shame on you. I will no longer be shopping at your stores. And I will encourage the tens of thousands of female supporters I have to do the same.”
source.

I will challenge this. Urban Outfitters also sells tshirts will beer on those tshirts.. also books on how to make your own beer! So what if someone was a recovering alcoholic? Note, alcoholism never “goes away” either. One day, this person is walking down the street, and happens to see someone wearing this tshirt; which causes him to feel anxious, and then relapse. 
Don’t know if you followed me, but basically.. It is not Urban Outfitter’s deal if someone has an unfavorable rxn to one of their tshirts, but it is the person’s rxn that reflects negatively on that tshirt.

(via wallacefennel—deactivated20110)
I COMPLETLEY disagree with the comment directly above.
So basically it’s a persons own fault if a shirt, that’s for women only presumably, has a negative impact on their eating habits? As a big chain and one that plenty of people, particularly young women follow, Urban Outfitters should know far better than to basically promote eating disorders. And yes, although this t-shirt doesn’t say ‘get yourself an eating disorder’ it promotes managing your eating habits in what would become an unhealthy way. Also, the model this shirt is on definitely doesn’t need to be eating less. If this shirt was modelled by someone far larger then some arseholes would try the ‘well it’s promoting healthy eating cos she needs to loose weight’ argument but I don’t have to deal with that now as the model doesn’t need to eat any less (not that I’m considering her weight judgementally) and also, the above arsehole argument I just outlined would be fat-shaming so that would be another argument for another day. Also, anyone who knows Urban Outfitters should know they wouldn’t use models any bigger than the one in this picture. 
Women have to deal with having distorted body images, pressure to look a certain way and shaming if they don’t thrust upon them on a daily basis, we’re almost drowning in it and most of it isn’t as explicit as this. This shirt promotes the idea that, regardless of how much you eat already (which hopefully is a perfectly healthy amount) you should be eating less than that. Furthermore, this shirt completely normalises the idea that women (women only I reiterate cos I doubt there’s a male version of this shirt and I’d be surprised it if it was unisex) are in part defined by the amount they eat and that now it’s not only not a bad thing to obsess about eating unhealthily but that it’s actually fashionable because a hipster chain like Urban Outfitters have now promoted it!
I can only imagine that this shirt would have a negative impact on women already struggling with eating disorders. Not ever having had an eating disorder myself I don’t want to generalise about how people who have them feel but I will say that surely anyone with an eating disorder needs encouragement and support to recover from it, and definitely not encouragement that it’s fashionable and trivial enough to print on a t-shirt.  

a-lane-a:

shroomssavedmymind:

randomness-is-epic:

Sophia Bush has declared war on Urban Outfitters after they marketted a t-shirt with the words ‘Eat Less’ on the front.

The One Tree Hill actress, in an entry on her personal blog, called for them to issue an apology and make a donation to a charity for eating disorders, and said, “It’s like handing a suicidal person a loaded gun. You should know better.”

Sophia wrote, “To promote starvation? To promote anorexia, which leads to heart disease, bone density loss, and a slew of other health problems, not least of all psychological issues that NEVER go away? Shame on you. I will no longer be shopping at your stores. And I will encourage the tens of thousands of female supporters I have to do the same.”

source.

I will challenge this. Urban Outfitters also sells tshirts will beer on those tshirts.. also books on how to make your own beer! So what if someone was a recovering alcoholic? Note, alcoholism never “goes away” either. One day, this person is walking down the street, and happens to see someone wearing this tshirt; which causes him to feel anxious, and then relapse. 

Don’t know if you followed me, but basically.. It is not Urban Outfitter’s deal if someone has an unfavorable rxn to one of their tshirts, but it is the person’s rxn that reflects negatively on that tshirt.

(via wallacefennel—deactivated20110)

I COMPLETLEY disagree with the comment directly above.

So basically it’s a persons own fault if a shirt, that’s for women only presumably, has a negative impact on their eating habits? As a big chain and one that plenty of people, particularly young women follow, Urban Outfitters should know far better than to basically promote eating disorders. And yes, although this t-shirt doesn’t say ‘get yourself an eating disorder’ it promotes managing your eating habits in what would become an unhealthy way. Also, the model this shirt is on definitely doesn’t need to be eating less. If this shirt was modelled by someone far larger then some arseholes would try the ‘well it’s promoting healthy eating cos she needs to loose weight’ argument but I don’t have to deal with that now as the model doesn’t need to eat any less (not that I’m considering her weight judgementally) and also, the above arsehole argument I just outlined would be fat-shaming so that would be another argument for another day. Also, anyone who knows Urban Outfitters should know they wouldn’t use models any bigger than the one in this picture. 

Women have to deal with having distorted body images, pressure to look a certain way and shaming if they don’t thrust upon them on a daily basis, we’re almost drowning in it and most of it isn’t as explicit as this. This shirt promotes the idea that, regardless of how much you eat already (which hopefully is a perfectly healthy amount) you should be eating less than that. Furthermore, this shirt completely normalises the idea that women (women only I reiterate cos I doubt there’s a male version of this shirt and I’d be surprised it if it was unisex) are in part defined by the amount they eat and that now it’s not only not a bad thing to obsess about eating unhealthily but that it’s actually fashionable because a hipster chain like Urban Outfitters have now promoted it!

I can only imagine that this shirt would have a negative impact on women already struggling with eating disorders. Not ever having had an eating disorder myself I don’t want to generalise about how people who have them feel but I will say that surely anyone with an eating disorder needs encouragement and support to recover from it, and definitely not encouragement that it’s fashionable and trivial enough to print on a t-shirt.  

28,394 notes
reblogged from a-lane-a
originally posted by wallacefennel--deactivated20110

  1. wh3re-the-wild-things-are reblogged this from iseethroughyoursmile
  2. v-logic reblogged this from etsevalente
  3. letsleavethistown17 reblogged this from lets-leave-this-town-forever
  4. yousaidthingswouldbedifferent reblogged this from cstrangegirl
  5. oh-this-modern-love reblogged this from timetoputonashow
  6. alwaysinthemiddleofboston reblogged this from come-away-little-lamb
  7. come-away-little-lamb reblogged this from randomness-is-epic
  8. iluvvariousthings reblogged this from kyartan
  9. heart-symptoms reblogged this from omgthatdress
  10. xxxii-xviii reblogged this from cj-sewers
  11. this-broadd reblogged this from cj-sewers
  12. countess-von-fangbang reblogged this from lachicakika and added:
    Wow there is something WRONG with Urban Outfitters
  13. lachicakika reblogged this from healthinessishappiness
  14. healthinessishappiness reblogged this from peaceloveandhealthyy
  15. that-one-picture reblogged this from sherrytranny
  16. sherrytranny reblogged this from jiji-is-a-bunny
  17. luciferthelightbringer reblogged this from sinner-notta-saint
  18. auroralachrimae reblogged this from mollycaenwyn and added:
    Why would someone who caters to teenagers make a fucking t-shirt thyat says that? Really. >.
  19. sillyshayne reblogged this from prepare-for-the-worst
  20. welikestoparty reblogged this from jiji-is-a-bunny
  21. sensitivefilipino reblogged this from jiji-is-a-bunny
  22. jiji-is-a-bunny reblogged this from cj-sewers and added:
    What the ever-loving-fuck????
  23. nightowl-honey reblogged this from cj-sewers
  24. apathecticanir reblogged this from cj-sewers
  25. lionsinyourpants reblogged this from myunoriginalmind
  26. myunoriginalmind reblogged this from yourhappiestintheforest
  27. ndungey reblogged this from cj-sewers
  28. prepare-for-the-worst reblogged this from cj-sewers
  29. drunkienumberstanley reblogged this from cj-sewers and added:
    Urban Outfitters CEO supports Rick Santorum and is openly anti gay. Nuff said
  30. lessonsinlycanthropy reblogged this from spaghetti-for-brains


Theme Urban, by Max davis.